Federalism in Canada for National Unity-myassignmenthelp.com

Questions: 1. On Balance, Does Canada Benefit from Being a Federation with Power Divided Between Federal and Provincial Levels of Government? 2. How Does Federalism Effectively Represent Regional, Linguistic and Other Divisions in the Society? Answers: 1. A federal government is a structureseparating up power between a central national and local state government that are linked together by the national government. Jurisdictions of control are divided, where some are controlled and managed by each level of government. Federal government systems are governed by charters that specifies what parts of public will be under the jurisdiction of central government and the areas that state governments command as pointed out by Smith (2014). The principle of federalism is central to the organization of the Canadian government. Under federalism, Canada as a nation is categorized into two constitutionally independent levels of government; federal and the local governments respectively. Does Canada benefit from this division on balance? This separation of government plays an integral responsibility in public policy and finance as well. Why does federalism exist? There are several reasons why federalism in Canada is preferable. First and foremost, it is important to note that federalism operates as an extra check on the government authority. In unitary countries or states, legislative supremacy is often extremely based within a solitaryrank of government (Rodden, 2007). In comparison, power may be distributed amongst various echelons of government as opposed to a situation where individual political influential or leaders control the power and trend of government. This in turns makes it easier for the citizens to access fundamental services without necessarily moving to a centralized and crowded place. In this regard, federalism brings services closer to the people and also inclusivity through the division of powers at each level of government. 2. Federalism lies at the heart of Canadians political life. Collectively with parliamentary, conscientious government and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it is one of the foundations which the constitution of Canadian rests (Canada, 1998). Federalism in Canada is closely connected with; The practice of democracy, The accommodation and recognition of linguistic, cultural and regional differences, The development and implementation of public policy. Federalism division has protected confined or local interests to a great degree. It links the people with government where a group of people of race or ethnicity can communicate directly to the government using various means. According to Dyck (2017), the government or the authority is more likely to react to a demand that comes from a group than that comes from an individual. These groups are known as advocacy teams or at times they are called social movements. Canada has states that are very outsized and have extremely diverse residents. In most cases, local groups in one fraction of the nation have often had a different political desires and opinions than other locations since the said regions are dominated by a section or a certain ethnic, spiritual, or linguistic grouping which is considered as marginal within the larger population. In this situation, the Canadian government has always listened to such groups considered as the minority (Stevenson, 2009). For instance, during National Housing Survey program, the Canadian government has always assisted non-residents whose first language is neither English nor French by translating the questions into 31 languages, an indication that federalism has effectively represented regional, linguistic and other divisions in the society. In conclusion, the division of power or federalism has a played a role in shaping political outcomes in Canada. The executive dominance in Canadian governments has resulted to their capability to approve and implement various contentious redistributive policies, for example, the national health insurance program (Dyck, 2014). References Smith, J. (2014). Federalism. Vancouver: UBC Press. Rodden, J. A. (2007). Hamilton's paradox: The promise and peril of fiscal federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press. Canada. (1998). Official report of debates, House of Commons: Reformatted from the original and including, Official debates of the House of Commons of the Dominion of Canada. Ottawa: C.W. Mitchell, "Free Press" Office. Stevenson, G. (2009). Unfulfilled union: Canadian federalism and national unity. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. Dyck, R., Cochrane, C., Dyck, R. (2017). Canadian politics: Critical approaches.